For four years, Chinese students must prepare for the gaoko, a test that
essentially determines their entire futures. Their admittance to colleges and
universities is based solely on their score-if they don't score well, they are
forced to work at a factory doing manual labor or as a construction worker.
Needless to say, they are given unimaginable workloads and pushed to the
breaking point. I believe that the gaoko puts too much pressure on students and
shouldn't be the only factor that determines their admittance to universities.
The gaoko puts too much pressure on students. They know that in order to do
well later in life, they must score well on the test, therefore they feel a ton
of pressure to succeed and put all of their time and effort into studying.
There is no time to relax or take a break-all they do is study, which is just
unhealthy. Some have even taken extreme measures which allow them to constantly
study. For example, in the article, "China's Cram Schools" by Brook
Larmer, it states "Two years ago, a student posted a shocking photograph
online: a classroom full of students all hooked up to intravenous drips to give
them the strength to keep studying." This shows that students will go to
extreme lengths just to study. Also, the pressure of the gaoko has been so
great that some students have even took their own lives. In the article it says
"Its critics say it...puts excessive pressure on students. Teenage suicide
rates begin to rise as the gaokao nears." Overall, the gaoko is too much
pressure for students.
It is unfair that the gaoko scores are the only factor that is
considered in determining the students who are admitted into universities.
Going to a university is really the only path to a good education and career
for many Chinese students. As it says in "China's Cram Schools",
"But for those of limited means, like Yang, there is no alternative to the
gaoko; a few points either way could determine whether he qualifies for a
degree that could change his life--or nothing." This shows that students
who are less fortunate must score well on the test to get a proper education
and have a promising future-otherwise they face the consequence of a lifetime
of hard labor. This is very unfair for them-a test should not be the only thing
riding on their chance at education and a good future.
In conclusion, the gaoko and the preparation involved with taking it is flawed
in many ways. It puts too much pressure on young students. Scoring highly on
the gaoko is also many students only chance of a good future, which is not a
fair system. A test that can decide the rest of a person's life is simply not a
good idea.
Angela's ELA Blog
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Martin Espada Essay
Discrimination is an issue that affects and has affected so many people in this world. It is too important to be ignored. In Martin Espada’s poems Two Mexicanos Lynched in Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877, Revolutionary Spanish Lesson, and New Bathroom Policy at English High School, the speaker explores the issue of discrimination in depth, showing us the people and cultures who are affected by it and helping us understand how wrong a situation where certain people arebeing discriminated against or victimized is.
The
poem Revolutionary Spanish Lesson is about how the speaker feels hurt by
people who mispronounce his Spanish name. In the poem, s/he says “Whenever
my name is mispronounced, I want to buy a toy pistol, put on my dark
eyeglasses, push my beret to an angle…hijack a busload of Republican
tourists from Wisconson.” Although the actions that are described are very
extreme and unrealistic, clearly part of some sort of fantasy that the speaker
has had, this shows how disrespected and offended, s/he feels when people
mispronounce his name, or don’t even try to pronounce it correctly. The
speaker feels the even if people don’t know him, his name is the most basic
piece of his identity, and it is the least they can do to make an effort
to pronounce his/her name correctly. Clearly, s/he values name and culture and
holds a certain amount of meaning to it.
The
poem New Bathroom Policy at English High School is about how the
principal of a school decides to ban Spanish from bathrooms because he
overhears students using his name in their conversation and doesn’t know
what context they are using it in. Although the topic of their conversation
is unclear to the speaker, s/he is clearly afraid of the unknown and afraid of
what people think of him. He had no idea what they were talking about, but
nonetheless jumped to the conclusion that it might be rude, offensive or
discriminatory. He chose to ban Spanish because of this.
The last poem Two Mexicanos Lynched in
Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877 weighs especially heavy on the
topic of discrimination, showing the readers the extent of discrimination
in some situations. The poem elaborates on a moment where Vigilanties who
have lynched two Mexicanos stand proudly afterwards, posing for a picture
with the dead bodies. It says in the poem “…Gringo Vigilanties cheered the rope
that snapped two Mexicanos into the grimacing sleep of broken necks.” This
line gives us a quite gruesome image of this lynching. And while the
reasoning behind this incident is slightly unclear, it almost goes without
saying that discrimination is a part of it. They are of course,
Vigilanties, people who take the law into their own hands, killing Mexicanos, people
who worked for Whites. It is obviously their belief that they should do this,
not the laws. Overall, this poem is a harsh truth, a reminder that there
are people who can easily do horrible things free of guilt or remorse.
This poem is meant to help the reader understand the pain that victims of
these acts of discrimination are caused by them.
In conclusion, Martin Espada’s three poems explore the topic of discrimination
in a number of situations ranging in severity. They are told from the perspective
of someone who has faced discrimination a lot in his or her life, speaking to
other people who have been victimized similarly, while at the same time
showing those who have not how much pain these people go through.Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Sonnet
Shall I compare
thee to a pretty song
Lines of a song
are long and beautiful
Sometimes your
words sound like they don’t belong
Your sentences
are short and unusual
Sometimes when
you talk you start to stutter
Though in a
song, the words have this flawless flow
Gosh, it is
really quite a wonder
Despite all
this, I would hate to see you go
When I hear a
song, I feel myself smile
When you are
around, I really do too
I guess I
shouldn’t be in denial
Maybe it’s just
hard for your charm to come through
Music can sound
perfect, which is so rare
I shouldn’t
compare thee, that is just unfair
Sunday, February 8, 2015
Scarlet Letter Essay
Angela Tanzer 808
Symbols are often used to develop
the readers understanding of a certain circumstance in a book. The Scarlet
Letter by Nathanial Hawthorne, is a story set in a 17th century
Puritan community, about a woman named Hester Prynne who must face consequence
for her deemed not only criminal but deeply sinful actions, by wearing a
scarlet letter on her bosom, a marking that titles her “Adulterous.” Hester has
chosen to stay in Boston, the place of her community, and has chosen to face
punishment individually, unable to admit to anyone the partner in her actions.
However by choosing to do so, Hester also creates a life marked by solitude, on
the edge of town, her isolation interrupted mostly only by her little daughter
Pearl, who is too, a major symbol of Hester’s actions-in fact the result of
them. In the book, aside from the most obvious symbol, the scarlet letter,
Hawthorne uses a number of symbols, which all serve their own important purpose
in enhancing our understanding and interpretation of the overall situation.
They help us understand the severity of Puritan law, and Hester’s relation to
it, and to her community.
One important symbol in the Scarlet
Letter is where Hester and Pearl live, a small cottage on the very edge of
town. Overall, this serves to represent Hester’s isolation and seclusion from
her community, however there are very specific ideas which Hester’s cottage
brings about. Hester is of course, separated and isolated physically from the people
in her community. Also, as described, “A clump of scrubby trees, such as
alone grew on the peninsula, did not so much conceal the cottage from view, as
seem to denote that here was some object which would fain have been, or at
least ought to be, concealed.” This quote shows there is an aspect of living in
this cottage, which Hester clearly desires, something sort of private and concealed.
Aside from this, Hester living on the edge of town can also be a symbol of a sort of boundary between her and her community, as well as Puritan society in general, as Hester is not like them. It shows how little she shares with them. For example, on page 153, it says, "Standing alone in the world-- alone, as to any dependance on society, and with little Pearl to be guided and protected-alone, and hopeless of retrieving her position, even had she not scorned to consider it desirable,-she cast away the fragments of a broken chain. The world's law was no law for her mind." This helps to prove Hester's mental separation from society, from others, even shows that she is slightly indifferent and doesn't care to preserve her reputation. Lastly, the wilderness by which Hester's cottage is surrounded can represent Hester's passionate personality, and her opposition to what would be considered conventional Puritan, which was straightforward and strict. It can represent how out-of-order or different she might appear in comparison to people around her.
Another central symbol to this book is the scarlet letter. A line that really showed how much Puritans in Hester's community thought of such a punishment as the scarlet letter was, "They
averred, that the symbol was not but a mere scarlet cloth, tinged in an
earthly dye-pot, but was red-hot with infernal fire, and could be seen
glowing all alight, whenever Hester Prynne walked abroad in the
night-time." It is made
clear, throughout the novel, that people who do live in Hester’s community, at
first scorn and look down upon her as the wearer of the scarlet letter, and
even as time goes on, use the scarlet letter as a way to define who she is,
whether or not in different ways than they first had. For example, when Hester is kind and helpful to people who are poor, they are unable to look beyond the meaning or power that they believe the scarlet letter has, and change it to mean "Able" instead of "Adulterous". While Hester has changed greatly as a person over time, and has chosen to do good things, they are only able to see her in terms of the scarlet letter, and think that it has worked in forcing Hester to think about her sin, and reevaluate her life, the only obvious reason for the positive actions she brings to others. What people in her community don't realize is that they are wrong--the two are completely separate, her actions are mostly independent of her punishment. Maybe she is able, but it's not really because the scarlet letter has "served it's purpose." Hester is a passionate and driven woman, as was her sin. She has channeled this passion, almost minimized it to her thoughts. Maybe now her thoughts have led her to make these good choices. She is a changed woman, but not for the reasons they believe.
In conclusion, the author does a good job of using symbols to better the reader's understanding of circumstances in The Scarlet Letter. They give us insight not only into Hester's life and inner thoughts, but also into her relationship to her community and to Puritan society as a whole. People choose to judge Hester for her one big mistake, although we know everyone does make them, and most likely a number people in Hester's community. The phrase "The punishment must fit the crime," is a way of saying the severity of the punishment depends on that of the crime, and should be fitting of it. However, in this book, this doesn't necessarily always seem to be the case for the protagonist, Hester. Overall, this book is filled with lessons and messages about making mistakes, about the consequences of them, and about relationship between an individual and a society or community. Symbols help to add to this.
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Banned Books Essay
Angela Tanzer 808
Banned Book
Essay
Dear
Ms. Berner,
I am aware of some recent requests you
have received concerning the removal or “banning” of certain books in M.S. 51
classrooms. Many parents wish to shelter their children from dark novels, as
they fear they might be damaging to them. They think that the dark themes and
questionable language faced by these books make their content unfit for their
children, or any child, to be exposed to. And these are only some reasons-people
have countless reasons that make them think it’s a good idea to ban books from
libraries. And critics like Meghan Cox Gurdon seem to constantly find flaws of
allowing children to read dark young adult literature. However, I disagree with
the concept of banning books. While young adult literature might uncover some
very serious topics, it also helps children learn more about the world they
live in, and possibly guide them through conflicts they deal with throughout
their lives. Children should be allowed to read what they choose. Therefore, I believe that books should not be
banned from libraries.
To begin with, students should be able
to read books that inform them about issues situations in the world they live
in. Books involving issues such as drugs, violence, rape, and poverty can widen
their perspective and teach kids that there are a lot of serious things going
on in the world that can’t be ignored. As privileged children, and many readers
of young adult novels probably are, it doesn’t make sense to go through life
with a poor understanding of these issues-about what’s going on around them. I,
personally, find myself empathizing with people who deal with these issues more,
when I learn more about them in books. For example, the novel Compromised
by Heidi Ayarbe really moved me and strengthened my understanding of the
harshness and brutality of life on the streets, while The Absolutely True
Diary of a Part Time Indian by Sherman Alexie made me truly empathize with
people who are a minority in this country. While some privileged children may
not experience many of the issues in young adult books, reading about them can
help them empathize with people who do. Also, we all go through something hard
in our lives and reading about it in books can help people who feel like
there’s no one to talk to make a connection with the great many people who go
through the same thing, even if we don’t know who they are.
Furthermore, for people who have
experienced these issues themselves, like victims of rape or abuse or people
who have lost many loved ones, reading books about the issues can help them
feel less lonely. In the article, “Yes, Teen fiction can be dark, but it shows
teenagers they are not alone”, by Maureen Johnson, it states, “For teenagers, there is
sometimes no more critical message then: You are not alone.” Having
something very serious and traumatic happen to teenagers who haven’t been able
to talk about their experience, or don’t want to, might make them feel lonely
or more introverted in general. However, reading a book about their problem can
show them that they are not alone, and that there are many other people who
have gone through the same or similar thing. By reading a book, people are able
to understand how widespread their situation is, and it can help them feel a
bigger connection to people around them, that they might not have known existed
before. And not to people they know personally
or might ever have to know, but that have had the same experience as them.Young adult books can also be an outlet for children who lead troubled lives, the only way to escape horrors that they face in their everyday lives. For example, in the article "Why the Best Kids Books Are Written in Blood", by Sherman Alexie, he states, "When I think of the poverty-stricken, sexually and physically abused,
self-loathing Native American teenager that I was, I can only wish,
immodestly, that I’d been given the opportunity to read “The Absolutely
True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.” Or Laurie Halse Anderson’s “Speak.”
Or Chris Lynch’s “Inexusable.”
On the other hand, some parents and critics have
raised concerns about certain young adult literature and think that banning it is
an effective way to prevent their children from reading “questionable content”.
Some even believe that reading books that deal with people who consistently
make bad choices, such as doing drugs or self-harming might influence children to
want to make these decisions, or just make it seem like a more reasonable option.
While I can understand that parents naturally have concerns about what their
children are exposed to and how it will negatively affect them, I don’t think
this is the case. Any good author of a dark young adult novel wouldn’t set out
to write their book with a goal to disturb kids or teach them to fall into
precarious sets of mind. That’s not why they
choose a dark theme or wrote about heavy issues. Many, if not most of them,
show implications involved with making these bad decisions, and teach kids why
they shouldn’t. Also, banning books doesn’t stop these issues from being a very
unfortunate reality, and an accurate portrayal of what is going on in the
world, even if it is brutal. In “The Bane of Banned Books”, Bill Moyer
says, “Censorship is the enemy of truth-even more than a lie. A lie can be
exposed, censorship can prevent us from knowing the difference.” He makes a
good point. Censoring books doesn’t eliminate the issues in them-it simply
ignores them and conceals them for people who have not yet reached that level
of understanding. It avoids the truth. But children can’t be sheltered forever
and the world that the kind of parents who ban books probably want them seeing
is too often not the world that exists around them.
In conclusion, I don’t think any books
should be banned here at M.S. 51, or anywhere at all. Books are a very important
part of the world, and of many individuals’ lives everywhere. They are the
foundation of learning for people of all ages, and the right to read them
should not be revoked for anyone. I think it’s unfair for people to take away
something that is helping others learn or grow or cope in their own lives, as
books do. Children, as well as adults, face challenges in their lives,
difficulties that can act as an obstacle that inhibits them from moving forward.
Although reading may not be able to help these people survive or completely
overcome these challenges, reading about similar experiences that other’s have
had, imaginary or not, can help them get through them, in the least help them
understand they are not alone. Overall, people should have enough faith to give
children choice to read what they want to, and enough faith that they won’t
make any terrible decisions when they have it. Of course this logic may not
apply in other realms, but in this one I believe it should. Therefore, it is in
the M.S.51 administrations’ best interest that they don’t ban any books
previously allowed.
Sincerely,
Angela Tanzer
Monday, December 1, 2014
Social Justice Project
Social
Justice: Looking at the World Through a Lense of Justice and Fairness
I read an article called “Where
Do We Go After Ferguson?” This deals with a very serious issue, which the
Ferguson case has recently brought light to-racial divide and discrimination in
the United States. When people think of racism, they might easily think of what
was “ending” less than 100 years ago. But clearly, this issue has yet to be
resolved or ended, as it has found it’s way into many modern day situations,
like this one. Police Officer Darren Wilson saw Michael Brown as a “demonic
force”, as the article states-and solely based on the color of his skin,
therefore taking it upon himself to shoot and kill the unarmed black teenager.
I find it completely unjust that Brown was shot, as he didn’t do any harm or
pose a threat and was just minding his own business. Additionally, the fear Darren
Wilson possibly had of him that influenced his death was judged based on the
fact that he was black. Had it been a white teenager that Wilson came across, most
likely he wouldn’t have shot. That’s not to say that police brutality is only
directed towards black people, but that obviously much police brutality from
white officers in the United States can be traced back to a frankly very flawed
and racist perspective that many of them have. Something this article said that
proved this perspective did and still does exists is “…Then you didn’t really
see what any Negro looked like, because ‘the Negro was never an individual’ but
‘a threat, or an animal, or a curse.” This line was very important, because
while whites might not be as extreme as to consider black people were animals
or curses, they obviously consider them a threat. Lastly, I believe that Darren
Wilson should have been indicted, as he was wrong in thinking this way, but
more importantly wrong in shooting this teenager. It is an injustice that he wasn’t
and that even now, years after moments in history that should have brought
closure to the issue of racism, unfortunately many black people in this country
still have to deal with people who never let go of these feelings.
Some things I observed in my neighborhood that I think are unfair to human rights are
Some things I observed in my neighborhood that I think are unfair to human rights are
the dress code
at M.S. 51 and homelessness.
Although I find both of these issues very
important, I want to elaborate on homelessness. Homelessness is a big problem.
Thousands of underprivileged people live right under our noses in this huge
city. Some are right on the street. And it might be hard for each person to try
and help, but even just the smallest thing like giving someone a little money
is a kind act. For example, the other day on the subway, I gave a homeless man
some money. It wasn’t a lot at all, but it wasn’t more than he asked for, and
it felt good. It felt good to give for once.
Interview with
Addie Lovell
What is good
about the world?
Puppies,
kittens, food, drama, summer, holidays, pools, hot chocolate, fall, the beach,
movies, One Direction, Larry, Starbucks, Netflix, Tumblr.
What is unfair
about the world?
Women don’t
earn the same pay as men for doing the same jobs, women get blamed for rape,
there is such thing as rape culture, gay marriage isn’t allowed in some states,
it’s unfair that a white police officer can shoot an unarmed black teen and
gets paid $500 thousand and is not indicted, a white male teenager can rape a
female student and not face any consequences, Obama is dismissing the Michael
Brown case, people believe there should be laws enforcing what they can and
cannot do with their bodies, animal abuse, people choose not to believe sexualities
including bisexual, a sexual and demisexual exist and genders like transgender,
agender and gender fluid really exist, although they do, there aren’t enough
gun laws to stop people from buying guns and killing people, animal abuse, when
a white teenager comes into a school and shoots children, people pity him and
think he had a “mental disorder”, Nash Grier and Justin Bieber.
Just
by looking at the second question, it is so much longer. Things that are good
about the world are simple pleasures that she enjoys, while things that are
unfair about the world are complicated and troublesome-rape, not believing in
sexualities, gun control, and the Michael Brown case. One of her answers that
really made me think was when she said people choose not to believe sexualities
including bisexual, a sexual and demisexual exist. I think that people need to
understand that others should be allowed to be themselves without being judged
or dismissed by anyone else. Everyone should be celebrated for who they are,
nothing less. I think it’s unfair that people take it upon themselves to judge
others wrongly.
Something I saw in the news was a
story about a football player named Costa Karageorge. The news said that he had
recently ran away, after a series of concussions he had from football.
Apparently, he was confused by the concussions. This makes me think about how
dangerous sports can be. People can get injured and ruined so easily. If you
really think about it, you hear a lot about stories lately about serious repercussions
of playing football. Also, this case is really sad because he was recently
found dead near his school, apparently with a self-inflicted gun wound. I can
imagine Karageorge feeling very confused and depressed. He might regret
choosing to play football because it caused him so much pain in the end. I know
I would. If I were the family of Karageorge I would feel devastated
about the terrible situation.
Someone who changes the world every
day is my grandmother. My grandmother is an animal activist. She is a vegan and
doesn’t believe in animal abuse. She tries to help animals find homes. Every
day she gets emails about unwanted animals and tries as hard as she can to help
them find homes, by telling everybody she can in hopes of finding an owner. I
find it inspiring that she has dedicated herself to animal rights and never
stopped trying. She is also a therapist, so she helps people who need support
every day, which is very inspiring.
When
I think about stereotypes in shows, I think of Glee. Glee is a show about a
number of teenagers in high school who join together in a musical group called
Glee. They’re all different, however many of the characters perpetuate certain
stereotypes. For example, the show portrays social stereotypes, including that
the football players date the popular, cheerleader girls. Also, the Asian boys
parents push him to get amazing grades. The only Asians date each other and
there are very few black kids not only in the club, but also in the whole
school. Also, the girls are sometimes portrayed as very needy and attention seeking
(such as Rachel and Quinn). I think it’s very important that people watching shows like this
understand all people are different and that one group of people aren't and
shouldn't be all one way, so as not to let these stupid stereotypes get to
them. However, I think that aside from the perhaps excessive stereotypes
perpetuated in the show, Glee promotes a very positive message, which is that
people can come together and do something amazing despite their differences. At
many different points in the show, one member would quit because they were
changing and thought that being in Glee made them a loser or a social outcast,
but they would always come around and rejoin. They realized that Glee was
something very special and something they all wanted to be a part of. This club
made a lot the characters break out of their shell and change. For many of
them, high school was a very draining and tough experience and so in many
parts, despite everything they had gone through themselves and with each other,
they came to love Glee as a second family, or an outlet. So despite the stereotypes
used in this show I think one of Glees more positive aspects is that it promotes
a strong message about coming together. Although, it is pretty hard to overlook
these stereotypes. Teenagers and adults are different and unique in so many
ways and can't be categorized by these standards.
Friday, November 21, 2014
Eleanor and Park Essay
Eleanor and Park
There are many ways that other people can
affect and change our personality and our overall outlook on life-things they
make us feel, or think. For Eleanor, in Eleanor and Park, there are a
few circumstances that very negatively impact her outlook in the beginning of
the book. Her strange sense of style and her crazy red hair make her feel far
too different from all the “perfect” girls at her school, and from most girls
she meets for that matter. This causes her huge lack of confidence about
herself and her cautious, guarded personality around her peers, for fear of
what they might think. Eleanor also faces feelings of bitterness and anger due
to her terrible, broken family life and her abusive, unforgiving father,
Richie. However, although these issues can’t completely disappear and probably
never will, through her relationship with a boy whom she meets and soon falls
in love with, Park, they seemingly lessen slightly as he helps her change and
open up more as a person. The major lesson I took away from this book was that
love change us greatly and can positively affect the way we see the world and
the way we see ourselves.
In the beginning, Eleanor lacks confidence and sees herself as unworthy in
general-and even of Parks love. For instance, when she’s on the phone with him on
page 109, it says, “She looked down at the turntable, at her own reflection in
the tinted acrylic lid. She looked like a fat-faced ghost. She closed her eyes.
‘Why do you even like me?” This demonstrates Eleanor’s lack of confidence
through the way she described how ugly she thought she looked, as well as her
doubt about Park’s feelings for her. She doesn’t believe that Park could ever
love her as much as she loves him, which isn’t true. Park loves and cares about
Eleanor so much more than she knows. Another example of this shown when she
meets Park’s mother. When she goes to Park’s house for the first time and meets her, she leaves
just a few minutes after. She felt too uncomfortable around his “pretty perfect
mom”. In fact she feels “She would never belong in Park’s living room. She
never felt like she belonged anywhere, except for when she was lying on her
bed, pretending to be somewhere else." This shows that at first even with
Park, she doesn’t have the self-confidence and continues to feel that she doesn’t
belong. Also, to make matters worse, over the past years Eleanor's life, it
doesn’t seem like anybody has really been there for her or attempted to
contradict her problem with low self-esteem, or any of the other issues she
faces in her life, for that matter, which could only encourage them to remain
or grow. She doesn’t have someone who she can trust and isn’t used to the kind
of support and appreciation she receives from Park, which is probably why she’s
at first so scared to accept it or believe that it’s really there. However, despite any doubts Eleanor has about their relationship at first, her strong feelings for Park are evident throughout the novel, as well as his for her. When they are on the bus and Park holds her hand for the first time, Park says "As soon as he touched her, he wondered how he'd gone long he'd gone this long without doing it." And for her-"Even in a million pieces, Eleanor could still feel Park holding her hand. Could still feel his thumb exploring her palm." This shows that they both felt such a strong connection in that moment, as if their touch was charged with energy and feeling. However, Park still thinks Eleanor feels weird or uncomfortable after this moment because she won't look at him all day. But on the bus ride back, she holds his hand, which proves that even though she was nervous while he was touching her at first, she still liked it and felt like it meant something. She even felt comfortable even to do it back. She has never felt this way for anybody else and was even calling Park a "stupid Asian kid" just weeks before, which shows how love is gradually changing Eleanor into a different person.
In conclusion, despite how hard it is on both Eleanor and Park as Eleanor often struggles to let go of the insecure personality she once held and gain confidence-even when they become closer and Park makes it clear that he truly loves her for who she is, in the end their trouble was worth it because they had such an amazing, irreplaceable connection and relationship. Eleanor falling for Park is something that makes her see herself and the world so differently than she had before-her feelings for him almost softened her a little. Eleanor thinks Park is beautiful and she can never stop thinking about him. She misses him all the time and looks forward to seeing him on days she doesn’t, when before Eleanor had nothing to look forward to but the horrors of a nasty father, a broken family and her own insecurity. Many people, even teenagers, hope to find that one person, someone who we feel is perfect for us-who will change us, who will love and care about us more than we thought anyone could, and this makes us a little different from Eleanor and Park, as they were never hoping to find that person. But those of us who are lucky enough to stumble upon that person along the way, as Eleanor and Park, might truly understand how amazing it is that they did.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)